( 2025:JHHC:17854 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5319 of 2025 --------- Rohit Kumar Singh @ Gazni, aged about 28 years, son of Nunu Prasad Singh, Resident of Near Cement Godown, Harmu Housing, P.O.-Harmu, P.S.-Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ----------- 02/Dated: 04th July, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.550 of 2024 corresponding to Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 480 of 2023, G.R. Case No.268 of 2024 registered under sections 387, 324 and 307 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court on merits vide order dated 09.07.2024 passed in B.A. No.4198 of 2024. However, the petitioner has filed this second bail application for grant of bail with fresh ground of long custody of the petitioner about two years. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and remain physically present on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial and shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. Hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. ( 2025:JHHC:17854 ) 2 4. Learned Addl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court on merits and this second bail application has been filed without any fresh ground. Hence, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of allegation against petitioner coupled with materials available on record and period of custody of the petitioner, I am inclined to release the above named petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No.550 of 2024 corresponding to Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 480 of 2023, G.R. Case No.268 of 2024 with condition that petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Pappu/-