Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14259 (UTT)

RASHMI BHARTI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/148/2023 · 2025-11-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9999 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/148/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Sudha Tamta, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.11.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487 df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA 875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.11.13 10:29:02 +05'30'