Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142570 (ALL)

PARMILA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA VIBHAG LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/6130/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33938 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6130 of 2025 Petitioner :- Parmila Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Madhyamik Shiksha Vibhag Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.2 to 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties no.5 & 6 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the opposite party No. 2 to 5, to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2025 there by take legal action on the representation of the petitioner in the interest of justice. The True/ Photocopy of the representation is being annexed herewith as the Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 and this Court may direct opposite party no.4 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.4 i.e. District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), District Shrawasti taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the private opposite party no.6, namely, Krishna Devi, wife of Late Subedar Tripathi, Resident of Hanuman Garhi, Bhinga, Shrawasti, U.P., with expedition, say within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench