Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14255 (PNJ)

SHYAM LAL v. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER

COCP/265/2020 · 2025-09-17

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** COCP-265-2020(O&M) Date of decision : 17.09.2025 Shyam Lal ... Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar Sharma and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate for Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for M.C. Ambala. *** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for not complying the order dated 20.09.2019 (annexure P-1) passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this court in CWP-26816-2019. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 20.09.2019, a detailed order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, which has been annexed as Annexure R-1. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although as per the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ambala, the plea raised by the petitioner has been found meritorious but the petitioner wishes to further agitate the matter as the order dated 28.02.2020 has not been brought to its logical end and has submitted that the present petition be disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 4. In view of the above the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of in view of the abovesaid order. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 17, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.09.17 17:10 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment