1 WPS No. 3314 of 2017 2025:CGHC:1007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3314 of 2017  Mohan Ram Gupta, through his Son Pankaj Kumar Gupta, aged about 30 years, R/o Darripara, Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. The Collector, Sarguja, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 5. The District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner :- Ms. Zainab Vanak, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For State-Respondents :- Dr. S.K. Dewangan, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/01/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representations vide Annexures P/7, P/8 & P/9 claiming half salary from November, 2013 to ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2025.01.09 10:45:07 +0530 2 WPS No. 3314 of 2017 October, 2015 and full back wages since November, 2015 till date with interest, but it has not been considered and decided yet by the competent authority. 2. Be that as it may, petitioner is at liberty to make additional representation along with additional document in support of his grievance before the competent authority and, in turn, the concerned competent authority/respondent is directed to decide the petitioner’s representation in light of the circular dated 01.10.2005 (Annexure P/11) and the document filed by the petitioner along with the additional representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of order this order along with the additional representation by passing reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid observation/direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit