ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA LUCKNOW andORS.
WRIA/22614/2016 · 2025-02-11
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8707 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22614 of 2016 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Madhyamik Shiksha Lucknow Andors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Saket Tiwari,Har Nitin Bahadur Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Nitin Mathur, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2. Despite notice having been issued to the respondents no. 3 and 4 and as per service report dated 08.11.2017 the service of the same is deemed sufficient, nobody appears on behalf of respondents no. 3 and 4. Consequently, the Court proceeds to hear and decide the matter finally. The instant writ petition has been filed contending that despite the petitioner having been appointed on adhoc post on 01.09.1991 he was not paid salary and has only been paid since February 2013 and hence the petition for payment of arrears of salary from 01.09.1991 upto February 2013. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. District Inspector of School, Unnao which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 11.2.2025/J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench