S.Gurumoorthy v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.
WP(MD)/15800/2025 · 2025-06-17
Vivek Kumar Singh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142502 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142502 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 S.Gurumoorthy : Petitioner Vs. 1. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (kumbakonam) Ltd Represented by its Managing Director, Kumbakonam. 2. The General Manager The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (kumbakonam) Ltd, Nagapattinam Region, Nagapattinam. : Respondents P RAYER:
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum for the belated payment of petitioners terminal benefits including provident Fund, gratuity and Terminal Leave salary from the date of petitioner retirement i.e. from 31.05.2023 to 10.03.2025 on which the said benefits were settled to petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah for R1 & R2
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the period of delay from 31.05.2023 to 10.03.2025 in paying the amounts paid towards the terminal benefits, within a time frame. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The petitioner was appointed as a Conductor in the respondent Corporation on 16.09.1994 and he retired from service on
31.05.2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's terminal benefits was not settled immediately and there is an abnormal delay. 4. In view of the same, the only issue to be considered in this Writ Petition is with regard to interest payable on the belated settlement. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 This issue was dealt with by this Court on various occasions and this Court passed orders in several Writ Petitions. In fact, the issue involved in this writ petition is no longer res-integra. 5. This Court in W.P(MD)No.4866 of 2023 (C.MuruganVs. the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., and Another) by order dated 07.03.2023 has decided this issue. 6.
Accordingly, by following the order stated supra, this Writ Petition is allowed with the following direction: The respondent shall pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits commencing from the date of retirement, till date of actual disbursement, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. No costs. 17.06.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 To
1. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (kumbakonam) Ltd Represented by its Managing Director, Kumbakonam.
2. The General Manager The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (kumbakonam) Ltd, Nagapattinam Region, Nagapattinam. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15800 of 2025 VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
PKN W.P.(MD) No.15800 of 2025 17.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis