Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14249 (AP)

SRI PUTUMBAKA SAI KRISHNA v. SRI YERNENI RANGA RAO & THE STATE OF A.P.

CRLRC/321/2009 · 2025-08-21

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010175172009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. SRI PUTUMBAKA SAI KRISHNA, S/O SRINIVASA MURTHY, R/O PEDDAPALEM VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 1. SRI YERNENI RANGA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, R/O J.D.NAGAR, D.NO.74 2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set Judgment of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 11.11.08 in Crl.A.No.246 of 2007 modifying the sentence passed by the II Addl. Judge cum-First Class Magistrate, Tenali, dated 27.07.07 in C.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 321 OF 2009 SRI PUTUMBAKA SAI KRISHNA, S/O SRINIVASA MURTHY, R/O PEDDAPALEM VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND SRI YERNENI RANGA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, R/O J.D.NAGAR, D.NO.74-8-8A, SRUJANA BHAVAN, THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the ionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set Judgment of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 11.11.08 in Crl.A.No.246 of 2007 modifying the sentence passed by the II Addl. Judge First Class Magistrate, Tenali, dated 27.07.07 in C.C.No.188 of 2005. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SRI PUTUMBAKA SAI KRISHNA, S/O SRINIVASA MURTHY, R/O PEDDAPALEM VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER SRI YERNENI RANGA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O VENKATA BHAVAN, THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the ionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set-aside the Judgment of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 11.11.08 in Crl.A.No.246 of 2007 modifying the sentence passed by the II Addl. Judge- No.188 of 2005. ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the judgment dated 11.11.2008 in Crl.A.No.246 of 2007 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, modifying the sentence passed by the II Additional Judge-cum-First Class Magistrate, Tenali, dated 27.7.2007 in C.C.No.188 of 2005. 2. No representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. 3. Heard. Perused the entire material on record. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that respondent/appellant/accused died on 06.3.2018 and no steps have been taken to implead the legal representatives of the deceased respondent /appellant/accused. It seems that revision petitioner/complainant has no interest to prosecute the present Criminal Revision Case. 5. A perusal of the report submitted by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali, also indicates that respondent/appellant/accused died on 06.3.2018 and a copy of death certificate is also enclosed. 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 22.8.2025 TJN 45 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 321 OF 2009 Dated:22.8.2025 TJN