Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142481 (ALL)

HARI KRISHNA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. and ORS.

WRIA/25308/2021 · 2025-09-18

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 25308 of 2021 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Pandit Venktesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Arun Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4. 2. There is consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in a bunch of petitions leading being Writ Petition No.7762 (SS) of 2017 in re: Ravindra Nath Taigor vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on 28.02.2018. 3. Accordingly taking into consideration the aforesaid consensus, the present petition is disposed of in light of the aforesaid judgment passed in the case of Ravindra Nath Taigor (supra). 4. It is provided that the petitioner would also be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of Ravindra Nath Taigor (supra). September 18, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Deep Mishra, Ajay Gupta, Om Prakash Nag, Pandit Venktesh, Vimal Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi, Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Abdul Moin,J.) Hari Krishna Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench