Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14248 (PNJ)

TELU RAM BANSAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1291/2025 · 2025-08-18

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-1291-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103+219 CMs-11078,11079 &11080-CWP-2025 in/& CWP-1291-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision :18.08.2025 Telu Ram Bansal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the elections for the office of President of Municipal Council, Mullanpur Dakha has already been held, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty that in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can file a fresh writ petition by impleading the President, who has already been elected on the basis of the elections. 2. Ordered accordingly. CMs-11078, 11079 &11080-CWP-2025 3. Present applications are also disposed of. CM-2170-CWP-2025 4. Present application has been filed for impleading the applicant AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.20 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1291-2025 (O&M) -2- as respondent No.4. 5. No order is required to be passed in the present application as the main petition has been disposed of. 6. Any other pending civil miscellaneous application is also disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 18, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.20 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document