[2025:RJ-JP:17963] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5260/2025 Prabhat S/o Shrinarayan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Heerawala @ Vijaymukundpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Abhishek Sharma S/o Shri G.C. Sharma, R/o F-201, Aanjnaya Apartment, 1091, Rani Sati Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondent/Appellant 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary. 3. Prahlad S/o Shrinarayan, R/o Village Heerawala @ Vijaymukundpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 4. Government Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Adv., with Ms. Anzum Parveen, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application was submitted by the petitioner before the Jaipur Development Authority for conversion of his land for establishment of petrol pump and vide order dated 22.09.2022, said application was accepted. It is submitted that order dated 22.09.2022 has been challenged by respondent No.1 by way of appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. It is submitted that appeal was filed on 31.10.2022 which came to be admitted on 16.11.2022 whereby notice was issued to the petitioner and [2025:RJ-JP:17963] (2 of 2) [CW-5260/2025] record was also called. He submits that without affecting service of notice/summon upon the petitioner and without ensuring the availability of record, an interim order was passed vide order dated 27.02.2024 whereby operation of order dated 22.09.2022 was stayed. Counsel submits that petitioner appeared before the Divisional Commissioner and submitted written arguments as well despite this, appeal is not being heard by the Divisional Commissioner. In these circumstances, a limited prayer is being made by the petitioner seeking direction to the Divisional Commissioner for expeditious disposal of the appeal wherein interim order is operating against him. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, so also considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the Divisional Commissioner to expedite the proceedings of appeal. The Divisional Commissioner is directed to make all endeavour to decide the appeal No. GCMS/2022/631 within the outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/71