BRIJENDRA SINGH SAINI @ BEERENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4653/2025 · 2025-07-03
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142449 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142449 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37580 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4653 of 2025 Applicant :- Brijendra Singh Saini @ Beerendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Kashyap Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The instant application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet dated 20.10.2022, summoning order dated 14.11.2022 passed by the Special CJM, Custom, Lucknow in Case No. 112174 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 392/2022, under Sections 354, 504, 506 I.P.C and Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station Gudamba, District Lucknow.
3. The quashing of the proceedings has been sought on the ground that the parties have entered into a compromise on 26.03.2025, a copy whereof has been annexed with the affidavit.
4. The applicant had filed an application under section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 1519 of 2025, which was disposed of by means of an order dated 27.02.2025 directing the trial court to verify the compromise. The compromise has been verified by means of an
order dated 26.03.2025 passed by the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow. It is stated in the compromise that the parties are related to each other and the opposite party no.2 does not want any further proceedings against the applicant.
5. The learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 has
supported the prayer made by the applicant and has given his consent for proceedings being quashed on the basis of compromise.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the charge sheet dated 20.10.2022, summoning order dated 14.11.2022 passed by the Special CJM, Custom, Lucknow and the entire proceedings of Case No. 112174 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 392/2022, under Sections 354, 504, 506 I.P.C and Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station Gudamba, District Lucknow are hereby quashed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 3.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench