LAKSHMI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY/. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIA/6095/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142411 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142411 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34025 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6095 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lakshmi Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy/. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Secondary Edu. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Zubair Hasan,Shakeel Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Zubair Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"i). Issue a writ, direction or order in nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents especially respondents to appoint the petitioner on suitable post under dying in harness as she is most eligible candidate as recommended by the DIOS and District level Committee. ii). Issue a writ, direction or order in nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.03 to take decision on the matter of petitioner."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., Joint Director of Education, Ayodhya Division Ayodhya and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., Joint Director of Education, Ayodhya Division Ayodhya ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if
any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench