Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142400 (ALL)

SITAPATI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 15 OTHERS

WRIC/5413/2025 · 2025-06-04

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34457-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5413 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sitapati And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Misra,Mohd. Khurshid Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims status quo order at the second appellate stage arising out of the proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Based thereon, he seeks the following reliefs:- "(I) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the state authorities i.e. specifically opp. Parties No.2 to look into the matter as per order dated 11-05-2022 & parwana dated 22-7-2024 issued/pass by the learned Board of Revenue Lucknow, in the interest of justice. (II) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the local police of the police station Gauriganj, Amethi do not disturb the possession over the petitioner's disputed land in question i.e. land gata No.395 situated at Village-Asaidapur, Tahsil-Gauriganj, Amethi during pendency of the Second Appeal No.746 of 2022 Computerized Case No.R2022047100746 "Brij Shyam & others v/s Kalika Prasad & others" under section 208 of the U.P Revenue Code, in the interest of justice. (III) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the state authorities i.e. specifically opp. Parties No.2 to decide the petitioner representation as per order dated 11-05-2022 & parwana dated 22-7-2024 issued/pass by the learned Board of Revenue Lucknow, in the interest of justice." 3. The petitioner may approach the appellate court, where the proceedings are pending or seek other remedy as may be available under law. We cannot interfere during pendency of the dispute between the parties at the appellate stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench