Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010128832025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/205/2025 FARUK ALI AHMED SON OF LATE BADSHA MIAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUHABIL DALANI, P.O- PAL HAZI, P.S AND DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781309. 2: SUFIMA AKTAR D/O. IMAM HUSSAIN R/O. VILL.- SUHABIL DALANI P/O. PAL HAZI P/S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781309. 3: SHAHADAT ALI S/O. SAYED ALI R/O. VILL.- DANA KUCHII P/O. SON KUCHI P/S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781314. 4: JEHERUL ISLAM S/O. FARMAN ALI R/O/ VILL.- PACHIM ALADI P/O. RAULY P/S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781311. 5: SAJIDUL ISLAM BULBUL S/O. GOLAM ROBBANI R/O. DEWRIKUCHI P/O. SONKUCHI P/S. AND DIST. BARPETA Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-781314 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM BLOCK-D 1ST FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM. 3:THE DIRECTOR WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM. 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301. 5:THE JOINT DIRECTOR WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM CUM BRANCH INCHARGE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SHAKTI SADAN UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM. 6:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BARPETA UTTER BARPETA PIN-781301 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : ANSHUMAN DAS, MR. P DEKA,MR. A CHETIA,MR R HOQUE Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 23.07.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) After some arguments, Mr. P. Deka, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal, reserving the liberty to the appellant to contest the writ petition, which is pending consideration. Acceding to the request of Mr. Deka, the prayer is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant