$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 122/2024 & CM APPL. 19587/2024 SUNIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None. versus ANKUR JAIN AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra, Mr. Aryan Tomar & Mr. Shubham Parashar, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 28.04.2025 1. The matter has been called out twice. None appears for the Petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the challenge in the present Appeal is to a dismissal of an Application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as the “CPC”] and the challenge is not maintainable before this Court. 3. This Court agrees with the contention of the learned Counsel for the Respondents. A revision petition is not maintainable against an order disposing of an Application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC. 4. The present Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. 5. The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J APRIL 28, 2025/ ha Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2025 at 16:10:56