- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22270 RFA No. 273 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 273 OF 2019 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARAYANAMMA D/O LATE MUGADIPALLI, VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 2. SRI. D.V. VENKATESHASPPA S/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 3. SRI. D.V. SHIVALINGAIAH S/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 4. SRI. M.V.NAGESH S/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 5. SAVITHA D/O LATE D.V.VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, 6. MONIKA D/O LATE D.V.VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 7. MASTER SUNIL S/O LATE D.V.VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22270 RFA No. 273 of 2019 FATHER D.V. VENKATESHAPPA, APPELLANT NO.2. 8. SUBHADRAMMA D/O VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 9. MASTER HEMANTH @ MANJUNATH S/O D.V.SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, 10. MASTER CHETHAN S/O D.V.SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, THE APPELLANT NO.S. 9 & 10, SINCE MINORS REP. BY THEI NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER D.V. SHIVALINGAIAH, APPELLANT NO.3. 11. NAVYASHREE D/O M.V. NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 07 YEARS, 12. MASTER SUDEEP S/O M.V. NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 04 YEARS, THE APPELLANTS NO.S. 11 & 12 ARE MINORS REP. BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER M.V. NAGESH APPELLANT NO.4 ALL ARE R/AT DODDAMADENAHALLI VILLAGE, AVANI HOBLI, MULABAGILU TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M.S.NAGARAJA., ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22270 RFA No. 273 of 2019 AND: SMT. INDUMATHI W/O K.ANJANAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMADENAHALLI VILLAGE, AVANI HOBLI, MULABAGILU TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. UMESH.A.R. & SRI. N.RAMAMURTHY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 READ WTH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.S.Nagaraja., counsel for the appellants has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the disputed involved in the appeal is settled. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about withdrawal of the appeal. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22270 RFA No. 273 of 2019 The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The Registry concerned is hereby directed to refund the admissible Court fee as per the Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 to the appellants. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8