PARVEENA BANOO AND ANOTHER v. U T OF J AND K TH SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2944/2023 · 2025-12-26
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14236 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14236 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2944/2023
Parveena Banoo and Another .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
v/s UT of J&K and Others .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 26.12.2025
Neither the petitioners nor any representative on their behalf has caused appearance, even when the case is called out twice. It shows that the petitioners are no more interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 26.12.2025 Raj Kumar Sr. No. 08 Raj Kumar 2025.12.27 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document