IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 221 of 2025 Date of decision : 28.5.2025. Vinod Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Addl. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening circumstances, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructious. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 28th May 2025. (kck) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?