Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14231 (GAU)

HARUNAR RASHID v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/3418/2023 · 2025-10-21

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010128582023 2025:GAU-AS:14018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3418/2023 HARUNAR RASHID S/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM, R/O- NAYAPARA, P.O. AND P.S. GOALPARA, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783126. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM (BUILDING AND NH) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BUILDING) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003 ASSAM 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOALPARA BUILDING CIRCLE GOALPARA DIST. GOALPARA PIN- 783101 ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOALPARA DISTRICT TERRITORIAL BUILDING DIVISION DIST. GOALPARA PIN- 783101 ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DUDHNOI AND GOALPARA EAST TERRITORIAL BUILDING SUB-DIVISION GOALPARA PIN- 783124 ASSAM 6:THE TECHNICAL BID EVOLUTION COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI DILIP KR. DEKA SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (IN-CHARGE) GOALPARA BUILDING CIRCLE GOALPARA PIN- 783101. 7:BIKRAMJEET GHOSH S/O- DULAL CHANDRA GHOSH R/O- VILL.- GOALTULI P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA PIN- 783101 ASSAM 8:DILIP KUMAR DEKA SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PWD (I/C) GOALPARA BUILDING CIRCLE GOALPARA PIN- 783101 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M NATH, MR. A ROY,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, MR P P MEDHI (r-7) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 22-10-2025 A submission has been made by the Mr. A. Roy, learned counsel Page No.# 3/3 for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Mr. P. Nayak, learned Additional AG appearing for the respondent has not objected to the same. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant