SMT RANJANA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF TRANSPORT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/6110/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33852 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6110 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Ranjana Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Transport Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghulam Mohammad Kamil,Mohammad Affan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Mohammad Affan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 to 5.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:-
"i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties especially Managing Director, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow (opposite party No.2) to pay interest @ 8.2% on the delayed payment of gratuity, leave encashment and difference of enhanced/re-fixation of pay scale to petitioner, forthwith."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.5 and this Court may direct opposite party no.5 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.5 i.e. General Manager (Drawing & Disbursal), U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Terhi Kothi, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid
stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench