Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142305 (ALL)

JAG PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/5355/2025 · 2025-06-06

Praveen Kumar Giri, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34791-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5355 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jag Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on record. Heard. In pursuance to an award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raebareli in M.A.C. No. 60/2013, recovery proceedings have been initiated. There is neither a challenge to the said order nor the recovery proceedings, only a writ of Mandamus has been sought. During course of arguments, learned Counsel admitted that the property which is sought to be attached in the recovery proceedings is an ancestral property in which the person against whom the award has been passed also has a share. The said person is his son. These are not matters to be seen in a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and there is no challenge to the said recovery proceedings. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 6.6.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Praveen Kumar Giri, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench