IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10257/2025 Decided on: 07.04.2026 Arshiya Sharma & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondent ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 3. Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has placed on record the result of petitioners’ re-appear examination of 6th Semester, in which the petitioners had appeared in January, 2026. Learned counsel apprised that, in terms of the aforesaid result, the petitioners have cleared their re-appears. A copy of the result has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that the aforesaid result is now available on the website of respondent No.2-University. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 Learned counsel has also placed on record the result of petitioners’ 7th Semester examination, in terms of which the petitioners have to re-appear in some papers and have passed in others. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, in view of the result of petitioners’ 6th Semester re-appear examinations produced by respondent No.2, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The consequences, on account of the result of the 7th semester examination of the petitioners, shall follow. Taking note of the result produced today by learned counsel for respondent No.2, this writ petition to stand disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 7th April, 2026(rohit)