Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4675 WP No. 2812 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2812 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI T M NAGARAJU S/O MADDANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT THOGARAGUNTE, MELUKUNTE POST SIRA TALUK - 572 132 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
2.
SRI L SATHYAPRABHAKARACHAR S/O LAKSHMINARAYANACHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDENT OF MAIN ROAD, SIRA TALUK - 572 132 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
3.
SRI L SRINIVASACHAR S/O LAKSHMINARAYANACHAR AGED 58 YEARS RESIDENT OF MAIN ROAD, SIRA TALUK, - 572 132 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
.. PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIVEK S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI V NAGARAJU S/O LATE PETE VENKATAPPA
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4675 WP No. 2812 of 2025
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DODDAGRAHARA BUKKAPATANA HOBLI SIRA TALUK - 572 132 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
2. SRI VENKATA REDDY S/O LATE HANUMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT MEDIHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK - 561202 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
3. SRI G SUDHAKARA S/O GOPALAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT MEDIHALLI, KASABA HOBLI PAVAGADA ALUK - 561202 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
4. SMT. YESHODHAMMA D/O KARIYANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, BALENAHALLI, KALLAMBALLA HOBLI SIRA TALUK - 572 125 TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
.. RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27 NOVEMBER 2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN MIS.NO.1/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA REJECTING THE APPLICATION
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4675 WP No. 2812 of 2025
PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(A) AND (D) R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the sought liberties.
4. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the documents produced by the petitioner, after retaining its Xerox copies.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39