JAGANNATH PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIA/6098/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34177 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6098 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagannath Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Utkarsh Misra,Abhishek,Atul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Utkarsh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1 and Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 & 3.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main reliefs:-
"I. to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing opposite parties no.2 & 3 to disburse the remaining retirement dues for his services rendered as teacher, in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. II. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing opposite parties no.2 & 3 to decide the representation given by the petitioner dated 06.03.2025 & 07.03.2025, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for disposal of the petitioner's representations dated 06.03.2025 & 07.03.2025, which are contained in Annexures No.4 & 5 to the writ petition and the same are till pending as per learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merit of the issue, opposite parties no.2 & 3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, District Gonda and Finance and Accounts Officer, Office of Basic Education, Gonda are hereby directed to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 06.03.2025 & 07.03.2025 respectively, strictly in accordance with law, by speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the
petitioner forthwith.
6. In the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench