[2025:RJ-JP:27669] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7009/2008 1. Amit Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Brahma Dutta Sharma, Jain Colony, New Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 2. Arun Kumar Gulpadiya, S/o Shri Ramesh Chand, Village Tiwara, Post Ghonsala, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through Its Collector, District Karauli. 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Rajya Krida Parishad, Sawai Man Singh Stadium, Jaipur 3. District Games Officer, Karauli, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Singhal for Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 24/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issue involved in this petition has already been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6799/2008 titled as 'Satyanarayan Meena & Anr. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.' vide order dated 21.07.2016. 2. Counsel for petitioners is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by the counsel for the respondents. 3. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Satyanarayan Meena (supra) has observed as under: "The petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.07.2008 whereby Handball players were excluded from applying for the post of Physical Teacher /Instructor/Coordinator in response to [2025:RJ-JP:27669] (2 of 2) [CW-7009/2008] advertisements issued on 11.02.2008 & 21.05.2008. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that no appointment was made by the respondents in pursuance to the aforementioned advertisements. It is also stated that a similar challenge seeking appointment on the post of PTI had been dismissed by this Court in Mohammad Mustkeen & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17038/2010, decided on 03.11.2011]. Therefore, as the respondents have not made any appointment in pursuance to the aforementioned advertisements and similar matter having been dismissed by this Court, I do not find any merit in the instant petition. In the result, the petition stands dismissed." 4. In view of above, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/37