Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38041 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6969 of 2004 Petitioner :- Barati Lal Respondent :- U.P.Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.And Anors. Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K.Upadhyaya,Asit Srivastava,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Nirad Kumar,Neerav Chitravanshi Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following main reliefs :
"(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.10.2004, passed by the respondent no.2 as is contained in annexure no. 1 to this writ petition ; (ii). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of ceritorari quashing the impugned office order dated 19.07.2000 issued by the respondent no. 2 as is contained in annexure no. 2 to this writ petition ; (iii). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to give effect to the impugned orders dated 16.10.2004 and dated 19.07.2000, passed by the respondent no. 2 as are contained in Annexure nos. 1 and 2 respectively to this writ petition (iv). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to work on the psot of typist on regular basis and to pay him his salary of the post regularly as was being paid to him prior to passing of the impugned order dated 16.10.2004." 3 An interim order was granted by this Court vide order dated 25.11.2004 whereby the order dated 16.10.2004 was stayed.The relevant portion is extracted hereinbelow :
"Till the next date of listing, implementation of the order contained in annexure no. 1 dated 16th October, 2004 shall remain stayed."
4. Supplementary counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents.
5. An office memorandum/letter dated 27.05.2009 (Anenxure SCA-1) which has been annexed along with supplementary counter affidavit filed on 06.3.2020 indicates that U.P. Jal Vidhut Nigam Limited (now known as U.P. Rajya Vidhut Utpadan Nigam Limited) has taken decision to modify the order dated 19.07.2000 issued by respondent no. 2. Thus, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the answering respondents therefore,
nothing survives in this writ petition.
6. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim
order to which learned counsel for the respondents has not objection.
Order Date :- 4.7.2025 Pks Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench