Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142225 (ALL)

PANKAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6109/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33802 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6109 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Social Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tarun Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Tarun Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1 and 4. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following reliefs:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to consider the recommendations made by Opp-party no.4 with regard to the Absorption/Adjustment of the petitioner as Physical Education/ English teacher from Eclavya Model Residential School, Bhojya District Bahraich to Government Ashram Paddhati Vidyaalay, Bichiya District - Bahraich. b). To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opp-party no.3 to decide/consider the case of the petitioner which was communicated by the petitioner by a representation dated 08.11.2024 as per the law." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., Director, Social Welfare Department, U.P., Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., Director, Social Welfare Department, U.P., Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench