NAZAR MOHD. v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH THE SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P.CIVIL SECTT.
WRIA/7502/2004 · 2025-04-10
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20352
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7502 of 2004 Petitioner :- Nazar Mohd. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through The Secy. Home Deptt. U.P.Civil Sectt. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Case called out in revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. However, Sri learned Standing Counsel is present.
3. The matter pertains to the year 2009 and since then it has remained pending.
4. After going through the prayer, it appears that petitioner has challenged the censure entry awarded to him. Now the petitioner has retired, therefore, writ petition has lost its efficacy.
5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. However, it is open for the petitioner move a recall application if the cause still survives. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench