RAJEEV KUMAR SRIVASTAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/6078/2025 · 2025-08-19
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142182 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142182 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48552 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6078 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Srivastav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Srivastava,Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Shri Sankalp Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being decided The instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main relief:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to regularize the petitioners within nine month from date of judgement dated 19.08.1992 passed in WP No. 6384/SS/1989, Vijay Kumar Srivastav ors. v/s State of U.P. ors along with all consequential benefit such as time scale, ACP, regularisation with all consequential benefit including arrears of difference of salary as well as regarding pension etc." The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the judgement and order dated 19.08.1992 has attained finality yet entire benefits as due to the petitioners have not been extended to them till date. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 i.e. Principal
Secretary, Housing and Urban Planning Department, Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.1 then respondent no.1 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules as well as considering the judgement of this Court dated 19.08.1992 within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioners. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench