IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1978 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2023 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Ram Sevak Yadav @ Sevak Yadav S/O Late Mahendra Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. 2. Raja Kumar Yadav @ Raja Yadav S/O Late Mahendra Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. 3. Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav S/O Ram Prakash Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. 4. Amarjeet Yadav @ Amarjeet Kumar Yadav S/O Ram Prakash Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. 5. Ranjeet Yadav S/O Ram Prakash Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. 6. Genda Devi W/O Amarjeet Yadav R/o Village- Mohanbadhiyam, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2025 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sakri Police Station Case No. 257 of 2023, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the FIR, the petitioners along with other accused persons, total 10 in numbers, arrived and the co- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1978 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/3 accused Ram Prakash Yadav assaulted the Pitti (uncle) of the informant by means of farsa. It has further been alleged that Ram Sevek Yadav/petitioner no. 1, Siya Ram Yadav and Harinath Yadav torn the cloths of the informant and when the informant arrived at the place of occurrence, she saw that blood was coming out from the head of informant’s husband namely Malik Yadav. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners along with others have been made accused due to land dispute between the parties. Both the parties are co-sharers and agnates. In the FIR, the allegation is that co-accused Ram Prakash Yadav assaulted the uncle of the informant by farsa but in the next line of the statement made in the FIR, the informant said that she saw the blood oozing out from the head of her husband/Malik Yadav. The injuries sustained by the informant and her husband are simple in nature as would be evident from Annexure 2 and 3. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are agnates, there is land dispute between them and injuries sustained by the informant and her husband are simple in nature, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1978 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 3/3 of anticipatory bail. 6. This application is, accordingly, allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Sakri Police Station Case No. 257 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. HarshPandey/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T