RANA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. ENERGY DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/6115/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33910 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6115 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rana Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidya Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Saran Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Vidya Bhushan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Meena Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1. Sri Alok Saran has accepted notice for opposite parties no.2 to 5.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.6 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties especially opposite parties No.5 & 6 to release the payment of pending / unpaid dues of the deceased i.e. husband of the petitioner, during his service period, which is made according to the law in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.5 and this Court may direct opposite party no.5 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.5 i.e. Executive Engineer, Vidyut Nagriya Vitran Khand, Hussainganj, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Sis Gomti, Lessa, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified
copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench