Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1957 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2496 of 2024 Applicant :- Sunil @ Sunil Balmiki Opposite Party :- Indrajeet Singh, Nagar Ayukat (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mohit Jauhari,Vinod Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 15.03.2024 passed by the writ court in Writ A No. 2055 of 2024 {Sunil @ Sunil Balmiki versus The Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow and another}. The relevant extract of the judgment is quoted hereinbelow:- "4. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party No.1 i.e. The Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow or any competent authority is directed to consider and decide representation dated 22.02.2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. Petitioner shall annex a copy representation dated 22.02.2024 alongwith copy of this order. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, the same shall also be provided expeditiously." 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the representation of the applicant has been decided on 09.10.2024 and whatever arrears were due and admissible to the applicant has already been paid to him. The copy of the ofÏce order dated 09.10.2024 has been provided, which is taken on record. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant, though admitting the transfer of the amount of Rs. 1,77,118/-, but disputing the determination of amount paid to the applicant. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted the judgment and order dated 15.03.2024 has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed but liberty may be given to the applicant to challenge the order dated 09.10.2024, if he is aggrieved, by filing a writ petition. 5. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law, if he is still aggrieved. 6. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench