Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14212 (RAJ)

CHANDMAL ALIAS CHANDU S/O SHRI BAJIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/426/2025 · 2025-05-20

Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21144-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole)No.426/2025 Chandmal Alias Chandu S/o Shri Bajiram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lachchhipura Tejaji Ka Badiya, Nodari Medra Tan, Police Sta- tion Sadar Beawar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) Through His Father:- Bajiram S/o Shri Tejaji, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Nodari Medra Tan Lachchhipura Tejaji Ka Badiya, Po- lice Station Sadar Beawar, District Beawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur. 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through The Dis- trict Magistrate, Beawar City (Raj.). 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/05/2025 1. Accused-petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Pa- role) seeking first regular parole for a period of 20 days. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that parole ap- plication of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the Superintendent of Police, Beawar has given an adverse report against the petitioner, however District Probation and Social Wel- fare Officer in his report dated 19.05.2025 has recommended his [2025:RJ-JP:21144-DB] (2 of 3) [CRLW-426/2025] case for grant of parole. It is further contended that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than 10 years. As per the report of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer, the petitioner’s jail con- duct is satisfactory since 27.09.2021. Thus, there is no justifica- tion in rejecting his parole application. 3. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the writ petition. 4. We have considered the contentions advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the material came on record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in cus- tody for more than 10 years, the report of Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner’s jail conduct is satisfactory since 27.09.2021, and the report dated 19.05.2025 of District Probation and Social Welfare Officer, we deem it proper to allow the present writ petition (parole), set aside the order/recommendations dated 30.08.2024 qua the peti- tioner and release the petitioner on first regular parole of 20 days in accordance with Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958. 6. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly allowed. The or- der/recommendation of the Parole Advisory Committee dated 30.08.2024 qua the present petitioner is quashed. The Jail Author- ities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of 20 days on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of the 20 days’ parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility [2025:RJ-JP:21144-DB] (3 of 3) [CRLW-426/2025] during the parole period. The 20 days’ parole period shall be counted from the date of the petitioner’s release. 7. In case, the petitioner fails to surrender by stipulated date/ time, the Jail Authorities shall be free to proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superin- tendent, Central Jail, Ajmer by fax today itself for necessary com- pliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir-Gourav/19