MOHIT PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6090/2025 · 2025-07-08
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38776 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6090 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohit Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Pandey,Sanjay Kumar Verma,Vinod Kumar Shukla,Vrishank Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner while learned State Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider case of petitioner for appointment as Constable Civil Police and for his training. Learned State Counsel on the basis of instructions submits that although petitioner was selected for the said post in recruitment recently held from but his appointment was not approved in view of pendency of criminal case. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party No.4 i.e. who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. The petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench