Sanjida Kidwai @ Nazo v. Mohd. Laik Kidwayi @ Julfi
TACL/127/2024 · 2025-09-02
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142108 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142108 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 127 of 2024 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Despite repeated attempts to serve the opposite party on the address as disclosed in the case filed by the opposite party, notice is not served. It appears that the opposite party is avoiding the service of notice.
3. The present application under Section 24 of C.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant for transfer of Divorce Suit No.116 of 2022 (Mohd. Laik Kidwai @ Julfi vs. Sanjida Kidwai@ Nazo) from Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.3, Barabanki to the equivalent Court at District Unnao.
4. Considering the fact that the application for transfer has been moved on the ground of inconvenience being faced by the applicant, who is a lady, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the Court of Barabanki are transferred to the equivalent court at District Unnao. September 2, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla, Awantika Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sanjida Kidwai @ Nazo .....Applicant(s) Mohd. Laik Kidwayi @ Julfi .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench