SYED ANWAR NADEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PWD DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/6483/2025 · 2025-05-30
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33785 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6483 of 2025 Petitioner :- Syed Anwar Nadeem Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Pwd Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Salman Abbas,Shahnaz Bano,Shambhavi Puri,Syd Shaheen Fatma,Vijay Vikram,Yogesh Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
"Issue Writ, Order, direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the Opposite Party No-1 & 2 to decide the representation of petitioner dated-20.8.2016 for the appointment under dying & Harness Rule 1974 with in stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court for securing of interest of justice to this writ petition which is contained in annexure no-3." After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided by respondent no.3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Perused the record. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to
the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.3 i.e. Executive Engineer, Maintenance, Division-1 (Civil), PWD Department Lucknow within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.3 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench