THE NIKHIL BISHNUPRIYA MANIPURI MAHASABHA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1898/2025 · 2025-06-10
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010127722025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1898/2025 THE NIKHIL BISHNUPRIYA MANIPURI MAHASABHA BHAKATPUR, SILCHAR, 5 CACHAR, ASSAM, REP BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE ABOVE MAHASABHA, NAMELY SHRI PARTHA SARATHI SINGHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE SANGRAMDEV SINGHA, VILLAGE RAJARGAON, PO PATHER KANDI, DIST SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006 2:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781019 3:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE ASSAM M.G. ROAD UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781001 4:THE DIRECTOR STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH TRAINING KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 781019 5:THE PRESIDENT BISHNUPRIYA MANIPURI SAHITYA SABHA ASSAM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE SITUATED AT MANIKANTA BHAWAN SARADAMANI LANE COLLEGE ROAD SILCHAR- 788004 IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM 6:THE PRESIDENT NIKHIL BISHNUPRIYA MANIPURI SAHITYA PARISHAD (ASSAM) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT C/O. SRI SHIBENDRA SINHA CHINCOORIE ROAD P.O. BHAKATPUR P.S. SILCHAR (SADAR) SILCHAR- 788005 DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H ISLAM, MR B SINHA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR. D DOLEY,MR. R P SARMAH
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 11-06-2025 Heard Shri B. Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant, who by means of this application has sought impleadment as party respondent no. 7 in the connected WP(C)/5032/2024. Shri Sinha, the learned counsel has submitted that the applicant is a necessary party and any orders that may be passed in the writ petition would affect his client. Shri R. P. Sarmah, the learned Senior Counsel for the opposite party/writ
Page No.# 3/3 petitioner has not objected to such impleadment. However, he has expressed urgency and prayed for early disposal of the matter. Also heard Shri N. N. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 and Shri H. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, SCERT. Considering the above, the present IA for impleadment is allowed. The applicant is accordingly arrayed as respondent no. 7. IA stands disposed of. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner may file an amended Cause Title by Monday.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant