Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34154 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6192 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harsha Yadav,Gursimran Kaur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Ms. Harsha Yadav and Ms. Gursimran Kaur, learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State- opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the competent authority be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of financial approval to payment of salary to the petitioner w.e.f. from the date of his joining and accordingly disburse regular salary to the petitioner including arrears thereof, with further prayer to direct respondent no.3 i.e. District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh to decide representation submitted by the petitioner. 4. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has been appointed on Class-IV post on 15.02.2018 and submitted his joining accordingly, thereafter the opposite party no. 4 sent the entire papers of the petitioner with respect of appointment to the District Inspector of Schools for financial approval. 5. As per learned counsel for the petitioner no approval has been accorded by the District Inspector of Schools. 6. Sri Vivek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that on account of amendment under Regulation 101 dated 24.4.2014, the appointment of Class IV post shall be made by way of outsourcing, therefore, no direct appointment can be made on the Class-IV post on or after 24.4.2014. 7. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the representation to that effect is pending before the D.I.O.S., therefore, the necessary decision may be taken in the interest of justice. 8. Therefore, without entering into the merits of the issue, the D.I.O.S. concerned is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, by speaking and reasoned order, expeditiously say within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 9. In view of the aforesaid terms, writ petition is disposed of. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench