Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.231
TA-938-2025
Date of Decision: 27.11.2025
JYOTI DEVI ....Applicant Versus
DINESH SAINI ....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present: None for the applicant.
Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate for
Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate
for the respondent.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Even, on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of applicant.
Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the present application.
Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARCHANA PURI)
JUDGE 27.11.2025 Preeti S.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
PREETI 2025.11.28 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document