Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141981 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF NAGAR VIKAS LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6112/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33876 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6112 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1. 2. Since no one has appeared on behalf of opposite parties no.2 to 5, therefore, view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties no.2 to 5 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the opposite party, particularly the O.P. No. 2, 3 & 4 to release the pensionary benefits due after his retirement w.e.f. 30-06-2023 along with the arrears with interest at the current market rate. (b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the opposite party, particularly the O.P. No. 3 to release the salary for the month of February 2023 to June 2023 along with interest at the current market rate." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.1 has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. General Manager, Jalkal Vibhag, Nagar Nigam, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench