Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141966 (ALL)

PUSHPA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. LEARNED COURT OF PRIN. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2ND PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER

A483/449/2025 · 2025-06-02

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34247 Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 449 of 2025 Applicant :- Pushpa Devi And Another Opposite Party :- Learned Court Of Prin. Judge Family Court 2nd Pratapgarh And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhil Kumar Singh,Gyanendra Pratap Yadav Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A., for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. (Now U/s.529 B.N.S.S) has been preferred by the petitioners with the following main prayer:- "I. Issue a suitable order prayer seeking a suitable order or direction mandating to respondent No.1 i.e. learned Court of Principal Judge, Family Court 2nd, Pratapgarh, to decide the present Case bearing Case No.454/2023, "Pushpa Devi versus Sanjay Yadav", under Section 128 Cr.P.C., P.S. Aaspur Deosara, District Pratapgarh expeditiously within such period as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to decide the matter expeditiously, within the stipulated time as this court may deem fit. 4. Learned A.G.A., submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Case bearing Case No.454/2023, "Pushpa Devi versus Sanjay Yadav", most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.6.2025 Rakesh/- Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench