Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14194 (UTT)

RAJESH BHATIA v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ED SECTION

WPMS/3509/2025 · 2025-12-30

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 45 WPMS No. 3509 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the respondent. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. He seeks directions that the appellate authority may be directed to decide the appeal expeditiously. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. The Court expects that the appeal, if preferred by the petitioner, shall be decided by the appellate authority as expeditiously as possible. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 30.12.2025 Avneet/