Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14193 (RAJ)

SHIV SINGH v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPORS

CW/8796/2012 · 2025-09-17

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8796/2012 Shiv Singh S/o Shri Bachchu Singh, aged about 26 years, R/o VPO Kherli Gadasiya, Teshil Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Medical & Health, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, National Rural Health Mission, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Bharatpur. 4. Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Center, Kherli Gadasiya, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/09/2025 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by appropriate writ, order or directions, the point No.12 of the proceedings/order dated 17.5.2012 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may further be directed not to terminate the services of the petitioner and further they may be directed to allow the petitioner to work continue on the post of Assistant, JSY, Primary Health Centre, Kherli Gadasiya, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur with regular salary and all benefits. Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit in favour of the petitioner may also be awarded to the petitioner. That the cost of the writ petition may also kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner." [2025:RJ-JP:37996] (2 of 2) [CW-8796/2012] 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, has apprised this Court that the services of the petitioner have already been terminated and, therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become ineffective and infructuous. 3. In the light of above statement, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/60