TANZEEM AKHTER v. DR.ANICE NABI,DY.C.M.O.RAJOURI AND ORS.
CPSW/501/2014 · 2025-12-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14191 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14191 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 29
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case : CPSW No. 501/2014 in SWP No. 2714/2014
Tanzeem Akhter …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None. V/s
Dr. Anice Nabi and others ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting counsel to Mr. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 20.12.2025
Vide order dated September 30, 2014, the Writ Court while issuing notice had also stayed the operation of the impugned order dated September 17, 2014 qua the petitioner and observed that she would be allowed to work at her place for posting, i.e., PP Centre, Rajouri. The records show that subsequently vide order dated March 26, 2015 the main case itself was disposed of. That being so, nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 20.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.22 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document