RAM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6188/2025 · 2025-07-25
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43082 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6188 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Rural Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Shukla,Ravi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Sri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate who has filed an application for impleadment on behalf of the outsourcing agency. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length states that he does not intend to challenge the selection of the post of Computer Operator rather prays that as petitioner has worked for almost twelve years, his grievance for being continued in service may be considered by the competent authority who is said to be the respondent no. 3 i.e District Magistrate, Unnao for which purpose he intends to file a representation and prays that the said representation be directed to be decided in accordance with law. To the aforesaid prayer, Sri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Sri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. The impleadment application is accordingly disposed of
Order Date :- 25.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench