2025:UHC:10043 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3162/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla & Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, Advocates for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Standing Counsel for the Union of India / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Raunak Pant, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 4. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 3. 5. According to the petitioner, her son died in a road accident in National Highway No. 109. It is alleged that the said accident occurred because there was no parapet on the side of the road. Petitioner has sought compensation for the loss of life of her son. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation on 28.3.2025. He submits that the competent authority may be directed to take decision thereupon. 7. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He, however, submits that petitioner has made representation to a wrong authority and it should have been made to the Executive Engineer. 2025:UHC:10043 8. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the Executive Engineer concerned. If she makes such representation within one week from today, Executive Engineer shall take decision thereupon, as per law, within four months. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.11.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487 df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA 875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.11.14 10:00:44 +05'30'