Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14190 (KAR)

SMT. SUDHA. B. v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/3041/2024 · 2025-03-10

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9980 WP No. 3041 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3041 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUDHA. B. D/O. BALANARAPPA N., W/O. LATE PRAVEEN S AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RAMASWAMYPALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561207. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIRAMAREDDY R.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE VIKASHA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES AROGHAYA SOUDHA, 5TH FLOOR, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560023. 3. THE DIRECTOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES AROGHAYA SOUDHA, 6TH FLOOR, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560023. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES AROGHAYA SOUDHA, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9980 WP No. 3041 of 2024 TAVAREKERE BENGALURU-560023. 5. THE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER, K. MALLASANDRA, KADUGODI POST, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT IN THE RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AS REQUESTED BY PETITIONER IN ANNEXURES- B, B1 AND B2 DATED 09.06.2022, 15.06.2022 AND 27.07.2022 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for petitioner has filed a fresh memo today seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE