Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1419 (UTT)

MOHD AKEEL ALIAS AKIL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/92/2025 · 2025-01-16

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:632 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 16th JANUARY, 2025 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2025 Mohd. Akeel alias Akil ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, A.G.A. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for regular bail in connection with the First Information Report No. 04 of 2025, registered at police station I.T.I., District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. The applicant Mohd. Akeel alias Akil is in judicial custody under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. 3. As per the First Information Report, on receiving a secret information on 03.01.2025, the police party raided the spot. The applicant and three 2025:UHC:632 2 co-accused were arrested on the spot. The police party recovered 30 kg of beef and cutting equipments etc. from the spot. 4. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 5. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not present at the spot. Nothing was recovered from his possession. He does not have any criminal antecedents, and, he is a permanent resident of District Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no likelihood of his absconding. 6. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A., on the other hand, has opposed the bail application orally. 6. 7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. 8. The Bail Application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant – Mohd. Akeel alias Akil be 2025:UHC:632 3 released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Vacation Judge Date: 16.01.2025 Pant / PANKAJ KUMAR PANT Digitally signed by PANKAJ KUMAR PANT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=9bb5448b4a92c65bab85a1384e98c8e23962296e78d4821a6ec01b408aa193c8, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=4FA443614ABEBC1A2C417A645E31B2B4B9D897811D160D334C31AA4BA 6D48D32, cn=PANKAJ KUMAR PANT Date: 2025.01.16 19:24:12 +05'30'