Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21804 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1100 of 2017 Applicant :- Praveen And Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan,Anil Kumar Awasthi,Dileep Kumar Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. The present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to set aside the summoning order dated 23.01.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C., Sitapur in Criminal Case No.56 of 2017 arising out of NCR No.173/2016, under Sections 498, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Taalgaon, District Sitapur and also the charge-sheet No.Nil/2016, dated 31.07.2016. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that an NCR was submitted by the respondent No.2 alleging that the applicants have abducted one Anju, daughter-in-law of the respondent No.2. It is further contended that the daughter-in- law of the respondent No.2 namely Anju had also taken her jewellery as well as jewellery of her mother-in-law. It is further submitted that when respondent No.2 asked the applicants No.1 and 2 about the whereabouts of his daughter-in-law namely Anju, they threatened him to death. 4. The police recorded the statement of daughter-in-law of the respondent No.2 namely Anju. The statement of daughter-in- law namely Anju reads as under:- " अभभ० पपम ससगर कक पपतत यसनत पतभडतस / अभभयपक - शतमतत अजज पपतत पपम ससगर भनवससत बबजनसथ कललनत भनकट पपरसनस डत०एम० बअगलस थसनस कलतवसलत जजलस सततसपपर पजछनप पर बतसई भक ससहब मबनप कलई गलतत नहत भकयस हब मपझकल हमसरप ससपरसल वसलल नप दहपज कप जलए पतसभडत करतप रहप तथस दहपज कप जलए घर सप धककस दपकर भगस भदयस उसकप बसद मम भकसत तरह अपनप मबकप पहहहच कर पजरत बसत अपनप भपतस जत कल बतसई तथस न हत कलई मबनप ससमसन व जपवर गहनस लपकर आई हहह मपझपर आरलप गलत लगसयस गयस हब। जपमर कक सफसई नयसयसलय मम दपनस बतसई।" 5. The record reveals that the daughter-in-law of the respondent No.2 namely Anju has already instituted a case under Sections 498A, 504, 506 I.P.C. against the respondent No.2. It is evident that she has instituted three cases; first under Section 125 Cr.P.C., secondly, under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, and thirdly, a complaint case against the respondent No.2. The record further reveals that it is a case of malicious prosecution and just to harass and as a counter-blast, the respondent No.2 has submitted N.C.R. in which the charge-sheet has been filed. 6. In such view of the fact, the aforesaid proceedings against the applicants is malicious and it is hereby quashed. 7. The application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 S.Sharma Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench